King v. Fitzgerald, Ocilla & Broxton Railroad
88 S.E. 929, 145 Ga. 164, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 222
Opinion
It appearing from the judgment of the court below that the injunction prayed for (the denial of which is now assigned as error) was refused “by consent of all parties at interest,” the writ of error will be dismissed. Zorn v. Lamar, 71 Ga. 80.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Fitzgerald, Ocilla & Broxton Railroad, 88 S.E. 929, 145 Ga. 164, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 222 (Ga. 1916).
88 S.E. 929 (King v. Fitzgerald, Ocilla & Broxton Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carroll v. Equico Lessors
233 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Patterson v. McFarland
184 S.E.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)