King v. Fitzgerald, Ocilla & Broxton Railroad
88 S.E. 929, 145 Ga. 164, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 222
This text of 88 S.E. 929 (King v. Fitzgerald, Ocilla & Broxton Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. Fitzgerald, Ocilla & Broxton Railroad, 88 S.E. 929, 145 Ga. 164, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 222 (Ga. 1916).
Opinion
It appearing from the judgment of the court below that the injunction prayed for (the denial of which is now assigned as error) was refused “by consent of all parties at interest,” the writ of error will be dismissed. Zorn v. Lamar, 71 Ga. 80.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carroll v. Equico Lessors
233 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Patterson v. McFarland
184 S.E.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 929, 145 Ga. 164, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-fitzgerald-ocilla-broxton-railroad-ga-1916.