King v. Fenton
229 N.W. 941, 119 Neb. 872, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 74
Opinion
This is an action in habeas corpus instituted by plaintiff against defendant as warden of the state penitentiary. Upon trial in the district court for Lancaster county, plaintiff was discharged from custody, and defendant has appealed.
We have carefully examined the record and find it to he free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Fenton, 229 N.W. 941, 119 Neb. 872, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 74 (Neb. 1930).
229 N.W. 941 (King v. Fenton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brott v. Fenton
235 N.W. 449 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1931)
Mercer v. Fenton
231 N.W. 807 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1930)