King v. Estate of Anderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

King v. Estate of Anderson

519 So. 2d 67, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 296, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 297, 1988 WL 4391

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 1988·No. No. 87-249·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

When Willie Anderson died, the appellant, then twenty-six years of age, claimed to be entitled to an interest in the estate as an illegitimate heir, pursuant to section 732.108(2), Florida Statutes. The trial court correctly held that appellant’s claim was barred by the four year limitation period in section 95.11(3)(b) for actions relating to the determination of paternity. See Gams v. Cruce, 404 So.2d 785 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev. denied, 413 So.2d 876 (Fla. 1982).

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

When Willie Anderson died, the appellant, then twenty-six years of age, claimed to be entitled to an interest in the estate as an illegitimate heir, pursuant to section 732.108(2), Florida Statutes. The trial court correctly held that appellant’s claim was barred by the four year limitation period in section 95.11(3)(b) for actions relating to the determination of paternity. See Gams v. Cruce, 404 So.2d 785 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev. denied, 413 So.2d 876 (Fla. 1982).

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

King v. Estate of Anderson, 519 So. 2d 67, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 296, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 297, 1988 WL 4391 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

519 So. 2d 67 (King v. Estate of Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related