King v. . Ellington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

King v. . Ellington

87 N.C. 573

DecidedOctober 5, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 87 N.C. 573 (King v. . Ellington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. . Ellington, 87 N.C. 573 (N.C. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

There was no exception taken by the plaintiff to the charge of the court or its ruling upon any point; and the plaintiff having shown no error, "it must be remembered that if the appellant fails to assign and prove an error, the judgment, although itmay be erroneous must be affirmed." Utley v. Foy, 70 N.C. (574) 303; Swepson v. Summey, 74 N.C. 551; Stephenson v. Jones,12 N.C. 15.

The judgment of the superior court of Wake must therefore be affirmed.

No error. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There was no exception taken by the plaintiff to the charge of the court or its ruling upon any point; and the plaintiff having shown no error, "it must be remembered that if the appellant fails to assign and prove an error, the judgment, although itmay be erroneous must be affirmed." Utley v. Foy, 70 N.C. (574) 303; Swepson v. Summey, 74 N.C. 551; Stephenson v. Jones,12 N.C. 15.

The judgment of the superior court of Wake must therefore be affirmed.

No error. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.C. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-ellington-nc-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack