Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York/King v. Eidman

King v. Eidman

128 F. 815, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided October 28, 1903·Published

Opinion

WADDACK, Circuit Judge.

Unless a son-in-law is a blood relation of his father-in-law, the legacy tax iti controversy was correctly assessed. The complaint does not allege that there was any degree of lineal or collateral consanguinity between the testator and his son-in-law. The question seems too plain for serious discussion.

Demurrer sustained, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Eidman, 128 F. 815, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247 (circtsdny 1903).

128 F. 815 (King v. Eidman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.