King v. Eidman
128 F. 815, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247
This text of 128 F. 815 (King v. Eidman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. Eidman, 128 F. 815, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247 (circtsdny 1903).
Opinion
Unless a son-in-law is a blood relation of his father-in-law, the legacy tax iti controversy was correctly assessed. The complaint does not allege that there was any degree of lineal or collateral consanguinity between the testator and his son-in-law. The question seems too plain for serious discussion.
Demurrer sustained, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
128 F. 815, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-eidman-circtsdny-1903.