King v. Ed Hockaday & Co.
Opinion
This proceeding is now before us upon motion of defendants in error to dismiss. The motion for a new trial was overruled by the trial court on May 28, 1909. The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on May 31, 1910, more than one year after the order of the trial court overruling the motion for a new trial. This court is therefore, upon the authority of the following cases, without jurisdiction to review the matters complained of in this proceeding: Sumner et al. v. Sherwood, 25 Okla. 70, 105 Pac. 642; Court of Honor v. Wallace, 23 Okla. 734, 102 Pac. 111; McMurtry v. Byrd et al., 23 Okla. 597, 101 Pac. 1117; Hebeison v. Hatchell, 17 Okla. 260, 87 Pac. 643.
• The motion to dismiss is sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1910 OK 228 (King v. Ed Hockaday & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.