King v. Ed Hockaday & Co.

1910 OK 228, 118 P. 256, 29 Okla. 194, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 268
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 12, 1910·No. 1735·Published

Opinion

*195 HAYES, J.

This proceeding is now before us upon motion of defendants in error to dismiss. The motion for a new trial was overruled by the trial court on May 28, 1909. The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on May 31, 1910, more than one year after the order of the trial court overruling the motion for a new trial. This court is therefore, upon the authority of the following cases, without jurisdiction to review the matters complained of in this proceeding: Sumner et al. v. Sherwood, 25 Okla. 70, 105 Pac. 642; Court of Honor v. Wallace, 23 Okla. 734, 102 Pac. 111; McMurtry v. Byrd et al., 23 Okla. 597, 101 Pac. 1117; Hebeison v. Hatchell, 17 Okla. 260, 87 Pac. 643.

• The motion to dismiss is sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Ed Hockaday & Co., 1910 OK 228, 118 P. 256, 29 Okla. 194, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 268 (Okla. 1910).

1910 OK 228 (King v. Ed Hockaday & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sumner v. Sherwood
1909 OK 296 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Court of Honor v. Wallace
1909 OK 89 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Hebeison v. Hatchell
1906 OK 56 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1906)
McMurtry v. Byrd
1909 OK 116 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)