King v. Dougherty

Supreme Court of Alabama

King v. Dougherty

2 Stew. 487

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By JUDGE CRENSHAW.

The question arising from the record, is, had the plaintiff a right to relinquish all his debt except fifty dollars, so as to bring the case within the jurisdiction of the magistrate? This question has been settled in the affirmative by a former adjudication of this Court. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and the proper judgment rendered here. In this opinion the Court are unanimous.

Judge Saffold not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE CRENSHAW.

The question arising from the record, is, had the plaintiff a right to relinquish all his debt except fifty dollars, so as to bring the case within the jurisdiction of the magistrate? This question has been settled in the affirmative by a former adjudication of this Court. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and the proper judgment rendered here. In this opinion the Court are unanimous.

Judge Saffold not sitting.

King v. Dougherty, 2 Stew. 487 (Ala. 1830).

Pincite

2 Stew. 487 (King v. Dougherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related