King v. Director of Revenue
Opinion
ORDER
Petitioner, Henry Clay King, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for review of the revocation of his driving privileges under section 577.041 RSMo (2000) after he refused to submit to a chemical blood test. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
271 S.W.3d 638 (King v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.