King v. Dennis

New York Court of Appeals

King v. Dennis

3 How. Pr. 419

DecidedMay 15, 1849

StatusPublished

This text of 3 How. Pr. 419 (King v. Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Dennis, 3 How. Pr. 419 (N.Y. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court said the Plaintiff should have turned the case into a bill of exceptions, by stating in the usual form that exceptions were taken to the ruling on. the trial, and had the same signed and sealed by the judge. This court cannot review decisions at the circuit. on a case; there must be a bill of exceptions or special verdict. As the court can take no notice of the case, there does not appear to be any error in the proceedings; therefore, judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court said the Plaintiff should have turned the case into a bill of exceptions, by stating in the usual form that exceptions were taken to the ruling on. the trial, and had the same signed and sealed by the judge. This court cannot review decisions at the circuit. on a case; there must be a bill of exceptions or special verdict. As the court can take no notice of the case, there does not appear to be any error in the proceedings; therefore, judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 How. Pr. 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-dennis-ny-1849.