King v. Delaware Co. Judge, of: King & Gannon
This text of King v. Delaware Co. Judge, of: King & Gannon (King v. Delaware Co. Judge, of: King & Gannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
DANIEL KING : No. 2 MM 2017 : v. : : HON. CHARLES B. BURR II, IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE OF THE : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : DELAWARE COUNTY : : : PETITION OF: DANIEL KING AND : THOMAS P. GANNON :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is DENIED. The
Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, filed by Riverwatch Condominium
Owners Association, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Furthermore, a Rule is issued upon Petitioners to show cause why they should
not be barred from submitting any further filings in this Court relative to the civil action
involving Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, including any related orders
concerning the awards of costs, as well as directives barring Thomas P. Gannon,
Esquire, from representing Daniel King.
This Rule is RETURNABLE on March 14, 2017. Any replies shall be due ten
days thereafter.
Jurisdiction is RETAINED pending consideration and disposition of the
submissions relative to the Rule to Show Cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
King v. Delaware Co. Judge, of: King & Gannon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-delaware-co-judge-of-king-gannon-pa-2017.