King v. Del Co Judge, Pet of: King & Gannon
This text of King v. Del Co Judge, Pet of: King & Gannon (King v. Del Co Judge, Pet of: King & Gannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
DANIEL KING : No. 166 MM 2016 : : v. : : : HON. CHARLES B. BURR, II AND HON. : BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER : : : PETITION OF: DANIEL KING AND : THOMAS P. GANNON :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is DENIED.
The Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, filed by Riverwatch
Condominium Owners Association, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See King
v. Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Judge, 2 MM 2017 (order dated February
28, 2017) (issuing a rule on Petitioners “to show cause why they should not be barred
from submitting any further filings in this Court relative to the civil action involving
Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, including any related orders concerning
the awards of costs, as well as directives barring Thomas P. Gannon, Esquire, from
representing Daniel King.”).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the jurists from the
caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
King v. Del Co Judge, Pet of: King & Gannon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-del-co-judge-pet-of-king-gannon-pa-2017.