King v. Dalkon Shield Trust

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 1998·No. 98-1395·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor.

DEBBIE KING; VALERIA GRIFFIN; No. 98-1395 SYLVIA JOHNSON, Claimants-Appellants,

v.

DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Trust-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge; Blackwell N. Shelley, Bankruptcy Judge. (CA-85-1307-R)

Argued: June 4, 1998

Decided: August 17, 1998

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Reversed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

ARGUED: James Francis Szaller, BROWN & SZALLER, CO., L.P.A., Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants. Orran Lee Brown, Sr., Rich- mond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The claimants in this case have chosen binding arbitration under the Claims Resolution Facility in effect in this case. They say that their injuries are listed in Exhibit A to the Claims Resolution Facility, and if their injuries are so listed, the question is, should the presump- tion we decided to give effect in Reichel v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, 109 F.3d 965 (4th Cir. 1997), apply?

We are of opinion that the presumption does apply in this case in binding arbitration.

The order of the district court appealed from is accordingly

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Dalkon Shield Trust, (4th Cir. 1998).

King v. Dalkon Shield Trust (King v. Dalkon Shield Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Robins Company, Incorporated
109 F.3d 965 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)