King v. County Disposal, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

King v. County Disposal, Inc.

877 S.W.2d 719, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1017, 1994 WL 270473

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1994·No. No. 65379·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-Employee appeals the award of the Labor and Industrial Commission contending the award of worker’s compensation benefits for permanent partial disability and for unpaid medical expenses was inadequate. The Commission’s award was supported by competent and substantial evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the reasons for which the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-Employee appeals the award of the Labor and Industrial Commission contending the award of worker’s compensation benefits for permanent partial disability and for unpaid medical expenses was inadequate. The Commission’s award was supported by competent and substantial evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the reasons for which the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

King v. County Disposal, Inc., 877 S.W.2d 719, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1017, 1994 WL 270473 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

877 S.W.2d 719 (King v. County Disposal, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.