King v. Connevy

52 Ark. 115
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Replevin : Variances Practice. It was- error to quash the order of delivery on demurrer to the complaint.

The complaint stated a good cause of action, and the demurrer should have been overruled. If there was a fatal variance between the description of the horse in the mortgage, and the one taken under the order of delivery, it was a matter to be availed of at the trial. The variance between the two as set forth was immaterial in any event.

Reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Connevy, 52 Ark. 115 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 115 (King v. Connevy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buck v. Young
27 N.E. 1106 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)