King v. Connevy
52 Ark. 115
Opinion
The complaint stated a good cause of action, and the demurrer should have been overruled. If there was a fatal variance between the description of the horse in the mortgage, and the one taken under the order of delivery, it was a matter to be availed of at the trial. The variance between the two as set forth was immaterial in any event.
Reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Connevy, 52 Ark. 115 (Ark. 1889).
52 Ark. 115 (King v. Connevy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Buck v. Young
27 N.E. 1106 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)