King v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of King v. Commissioner of Social Security (King v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) JENNIFER LYNN KING, ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No.: 3:20-cv-0479 ) v. ) ) Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees in the amount of $2,500.00 (two thousand five hundred dollars), and costs in the amount of $0.00, for a total of $2,500.00 (two thousand five hundred dollars); 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 7, 2021 s_/_P_e_te_r_ _B_. _S_il_v_a_in_,_ J_r_.________ Peter B. Silvain, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
King v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ohsd-2021.