King v. Clements

243 A.D. 853
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 853 (King v. Clements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Clements, 243 A.D. 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Judgment modified on the law and facts by fixing the value of the chattel at $1,334.28 and as modified affirmed, without costs. Finding of fact numbered 4 modified accordingly. Memorandum: We hold that the value of the linotype machine as fixed by the trial court in the sum of $1,800 is contrary to law and contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. The value should be fixed at the amount of plaintiff’s special interest in the property. (See Townsend v. Bargy, 57 N. Y. 665; Allen v. Judson, 71 id. 77; Fowler v. Haynes, 91 id. 346; Brockway Motor Truck Corp. v. Selzer, 235 App. Div. 759.) All concur. (The judgment awards plaintiff possession of a linotype machine or its value.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Utica v. Castle Ford, Inc.
56 Misc. 2d 301 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-clements-nyappdiv-1935.