King v. C&K Market, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 9, 2022·No. 2:16-cv-00559·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DEBORAH KING, No. 2:16-cv-00559-TL -DMC N 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 13 C & K MARKET INC, dba RAY'S 14 FOOD PLACE #25, 15 Defendant. 16 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the Court 17 makes the following Pretrial Scheduling Order. 18 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 19 All named Defendants have been served and no further service 20 is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been 21 shown. 22 II. ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS 23 No joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is 24 permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown. 25 III. JURISDICTION/VENUE 26 Jurisdiction is predicated upon 42 USC Chapter 126, Section 27 12112(a). Jurisdiction and venue are not contested. 28 1 IV. DISCOVERY 2 All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall 3 be completed by August 25, 2022. In this context, “completed” 4 means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all 5 depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to 6 discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if 7 necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has 8 been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on 9 the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local 10 rules of this Court. 11 Any request to deviate from the Federal Rules of Civil 12 Procedure should be made to the assigned Magistrate Judge. 13 V. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES 14 All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the 15 Court, and serve upon all other parties the name, address, and 16 area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at 17 trial not later than October 27, 2022.1 The designation shall be 18 accompanied by a written report prepared and signed by the 19 witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 26(a)(2)(B). 21 Within twenty (20) days after the designation of expert 22 witnesses, any party may designate a supplemental list of expert 23 witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an 24 expert designated by an adverse party. 25 /// 26 ///

27 1 The discovery of experts will include whether any motions based on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and/or Kumho Tire 28 Co. v. Carmichael, 119 S. Ct. 1167 (1999) are anticipated. 1 The right to designate a supplemental expert for rebuttal 2 purposes only shall apply to a party who has not previously 3 disclosed an expert witness on the date set for expert witness 4 disclosure by this Pretrial Scheduling Order. 5 Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as 6 set forth above in all likelihood will preclude that party from 7 calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert 8 witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to 9 testify unless the party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) 10 that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably 11 anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the 12 Court and opposing counsel were promptly notified upon discovery 13 of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made 14 available for deposition. 15 For purposes of this Pretrial Scheduling Order, an “expert” 16 is any person who may be used at trial to present evidence under 17 Rules 702, 703, and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which 18 include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their 19 expertise, have rendered expert opinions in the normal course of 20 their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the 21 case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by 22 a party to be a testifying expert for the purposes of 23 litigation). 24 Each party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is 25 percipient, retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party 26 designating a retained expert has acquired the express permission 27 of the witness to be so listed. 28 /// 1 Parties designating percipient experts must state in the 2 designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of 3 such persons. 4 All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time 5 of designation to render an informed opinion, and give their 6 bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full 7 and complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing 8 party. Experts will not be permitted to testify at the trial as 9 to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, 10 after deposition taken subsequent to designation. 11 Counsel are instructed to complete all discovery of expert 12 witnesses in a timely manner in order to comply with the Court’s 13 deadline for filing dispositive motions. 14 VI. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY 15 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e), the 16 parties shall exchange any supplemental disclosures and responses 17 (including expert supplemental materials) no later than thirty 18 (30) days prior to the dispositive motion hearing date. Any 19 supplemental disclosures and responses necessary after that date 20 will require leave of Court good cause having been shown. 21 VII. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE 22 All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, 23 temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, 24 shall be heard no later than February 23, 2023. 25 All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely 26 pretrial motions. Local Rule 230 governs the calendaring and 27 procedures of civil motions with the following additions: 28 /// 1 (a) The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on 2 the day due; and 3 (b) When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls 4 on a legal holiday, the opposition brief shall be filed 5 on the last court day immediately preceding the legal 6 holiday. 7 Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by 8 this order, may be deemed consent to the motion and the court may 9 dispose of the motion summarily. Further, failure to timely 10 oppose a summary judgment motion2 may result in the granting of 11 that motion if the movant shifts the burden to the nonmovant to 12 demonstrate that a genuine issue of material fact remains for 13 trial. 14 The Court places a page limit for points and authorities 15 (exclusive of exhibits and other supporting documentation) of 16 twenty (20) pages on all initial moving papers, twenty (20) pages 17 on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for 18 page limit increases must be made in writing to the Court setting 19 forth any and all reasons for any increase in page limit at least 20 fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion. 21 For the Court’s convenience, citations to Supreme Court 22 cases should include parallel citations to the Supreme Court 23 Reporter. 24 The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a 25 pretrial procedural device designed to address the admissibility 26 of evidence. The Court will look with disfavor upon

27 2 The Court urges any party that contemplates bringing a motion for summary judgment or who must oppose a motion for summary judgment to review Local Rule 28 260. 1 dispositional motions presented in the guise of motions in 2 limine. 3 The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a 4 dispositive legal issue that could have been tendered to the 5 court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion 6 cut-off date may constitute waiver of such issue. 7 VIII.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. C&K Market, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2022).

King v. C&K Market, Inc. (King v. C&K Market, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
526 U.S. 137 (Supreme Court, 1999)