King v. City of Sacramento

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 13, 2023
Docket2:20-cv-01326
StatusUnknown

This text of King v. City of Sacramento (King v. City of Sacramento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. City of Sacramento, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 KELLAN S. PATTERSON, ESQ. SB No. 307190 Law Office of Kellan Patterson 2 2450 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 200 3 Sacramento, CA 95833 P: (916) 905-7265 4 F: (916) 721-2742 5 E: info@kellanpatterson.com 6 Attorney for Plaintiff TRAVIS KING 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRAVIS KING, an individual, No. 2:20-cv-1326-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v.

14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, as a municipality, JONATHAN HOUSTON, in 15 his individual capacity, ANTHONY BOLER, in his individual capacity, ERIC 16 KLOCKENBRINK, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION and 17 DOES 1-100; 18 Defendants. 19 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 22 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 23 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 24 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 25 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 26 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 27 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 28 1 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential 2 information under seal; Civil Local Rules 140 and 141 sets forth the procedures that must be 3 followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to 4 file material under seal. 5 2. DEFINITIONS 6 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or 7 items under this Order. 8 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 9 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 10 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 11 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 12 well as their support staff). 13 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that 14 it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 15 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 16 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other 17 things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in 18 disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 19 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 20 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness 21 or as a consultant in this action. 22 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 23 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 24 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 25 entity not named as a Party to this action. 26 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 27 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in 28 this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on 1 behalf of that party. 2 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 3 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 4 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 5 Material in this action. 6 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 7 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 8 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 9 subcontractors. 10 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 11 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 12 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 13 Producing Party. 14 3. SCOPE 15 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 16 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 17 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 18 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 19 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 20 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 21 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 22 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party 23 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 24 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 25 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 26 4. DURATION 27 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 28 1 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 2 order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all 3 claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after 4 the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 5 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 6 applicable law. 7 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 8 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 9 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 10 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 11 The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, 12 items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, 13 documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 14 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 15 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 16 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 17 unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary 18 expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 19 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated 20 for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other 21 Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 22 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order 23 (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 24 Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 25 designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
King v. City of Sacramento, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-city-of-sacramento-caed-2023.