King v. City of New York

209 A.D.2d 673, 619 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11752
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 14, 1993, which granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the jury verdict in the defendants’ favor on the issue of liability and ordered a new trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In light of the inflammatory and improper summation comments of the defense counsel and the strong evidence of negligence offered by the plaintiff in support of a liability finding against the defendants, we conclude that the court properly exercised its discretion under CPLR 4404 (a) by setting aside the jury’s verdict and ordering a new trial. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. City of New York, 209 A.D.2d 673, 619 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 673 (King v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grasso v. Koslowe
38 A.D.3d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Pagano v. Murray
309 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)