King v. City of Little Rock
This text of 26 Ark. 479 (King v. City of Little Rock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
King and Ackmeyer were charged, before the police court of the city of Tuttle Rock, with violating one of its ordinances, and found guilty and fined ten dollars and costs, from which judgment they took an appeal to the circuit court, where the same fine was again imposed.
No bill of exceptions was taken; neither was there a motion for a new trial, and King and Ackmeyer appealed, and the record says, excepted to the judgment and rulings of the court below. An agreed statement of facts, constitutes no part of a record, unless made so by bill of exceptions or the order of the court. To hear this case under such circumstances, would be to assume original jurisdiction of the ease, and the subject matter, coming within the rule laid down in the ease of Ashley v. Stoddard, as this case clearly does, we can do nothing but affirm the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Ark. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-city-of-little-rock-ark-1871.