King v. Central Hardware Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

King v. Central Hardware Co.

85 So. 822, 204 Ala. 336, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 162

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 3, 1920

Docket4 Div. 876.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 85 So. 822 (King v. Central Hardware Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Central Hardware Co., 85 So. 822, 204 Ala. 336, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 162 (Ala. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court is of the opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant. Taliaferro v. Lane, 23 Ala. 369; Abraham v. Nicrosi, 87 Ala. 173, 6 South. 293. This question was not raised or adjudicated in this case on the former appeal. 200 Ala. 209, 75 South. 967.

Reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity herewith.

All (the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This court is of the opinion that the trial court committed error in admitting the record of the judgment recovered by plaintiff against defendant. Taliaferro v. Lane, 23 Ala. 369; Abraham v. Nicrosi, 87 Ala. 173, 6 South. 293. This question was not raised or adjudicated in this case on the former appeal. 200 Ala. 209, 75 South. 967.

Reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity herewith.

All (the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 So. 822, 204 Ala. 336, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-central-hardware-co-ala-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack