Home/Supreme Court/King v. Buskirk

King v. Buskirk

231 U.S. 735, 34 S. Ct. 316, 58 L. Ed. 460, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2498
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 27, 1913
DocketNo. 584
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 231 U.S. 735 (King v. Buskirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Buskirk, 231 U.S. 735, 34 S. Ct. 316, 58 L. Ed. 460, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2498 (1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455, 456, and cases cited; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Waters-[736]*736Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 117-118.

Mr. Maynard F. Stiles for the appellant. Mr. Frank Cox and Mr. W. B. Lilly for the defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Buffalo Creek Coal & Coke Co.
245 U.S. 328 (Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 U.S. 735, 34 S. Ct. 316, 58 L. Ed. 460, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-buskirk-scotus-1913.