King v. Buskirk

231 U.S. 735, 34 S. Ct. 316, 58 L. Ed. 460, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2498
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 27, 1913·No. No. 584·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455, 456, and cases cited; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Waters-[736]*736Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 117-118.

Mr. Maynard F. Stiles for the appellant. Mr. Frank Cox and Mr. W. B. Lilly for the defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Buskirk, 231 U.S. 735, 34 S. Ct. 316, 58 L. Ed. 460, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2498 (1913).

231 U.S. 735 (King v. Buskirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Buffalo Creek Coal & Coke Co.
245 U.S. 328 (Supreme Court, 1917)