King v. Burnham

129 Mass. 598, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 307
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 24, 1880·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

Under the rules of the Superior Court, the clerk indeed had no power, without a special order of the court, to make up and enter the judgment in the former action, rmW« the necessary papers were filed within six months after the judgment upon default. But the court had power, upon petition and after notice to the adverse party, to order the record to be completed, and the judgment made up and entered; and the judgment, when so recorded, took effect from the date of the original judgment. Rugg v. Parker, 7 Gray, 172. Parker v. Rugg, 9 Gray, 209. The present action having been commenced after that date, it was within the discretion of the court to allow the plaintiff to file an amended declaration therein, counting upon that judgment. Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 41. Kendall v. Carland, 5 Cush. 74. Goodrich v. Bodurtha, 6 Gray, 323.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Burnham, 129 Mass. 598, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 307 (Mass. 1880).

129 Mass. 598 (King v. Burnham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

H. C. Miner Litho. Co. v. Wagner
58 N.E. 1020 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)