King v. Browning Ferris Industries

7 S.W.3d 569, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2316, 1999 WL 1073123
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 30, 1999·No. No. ED 76004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Browning Ferris Industries (“Employer”) appeals the Decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarding compensation to Jeff King (“Employee”) based on a finding he sustained an acciden[570]*570tal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Browning Ferris Industries, 7 S.W.3d 569, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2316, 1999 WL 1073123 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

7 S.W.3d 569 (King v. Browning Ferris Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related