King v. Blount

37 Ark. 115
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Harrison, J.

The lien of the landlord continues but for six months after the rent becomes due. Sec, 4098 Gantt’sDigest.

And where there has been a conversion of the crop, or a. portion of it, by one with knowledge of the lien, and it attaches in equity to the proceeds in his hands, its continuance is only for the same period, for equity follows the-law. Valentine v. Hamlett, Ad’r., MS. Opinion.

The suit not having been commenced within six months-after the rent became due, and the lien having expired, no-equity or cause of action was shown in the complaint.

The,decree of the Court below is, therefore, reversed,, and the. complaint dismissed for the want of equity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Blount, 37 Ark. 115 (Ark. 1881).

37 Ark. 115 (King v. Blount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bottrell v. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co.
291 S.W. 832 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1927)