King v. Bernards Tp.

61 F.3d 895, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17901, 1995 WL 406602
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1995
Docket94-5617
StatusPublished

This text of 61 F.3d 895 (King v. Bernards Tp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Bernards Tp., 61 F.3d 895, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17901, 1995 WL 406602 (3d Cir. 1995).

Opinion

61 F.3d 895

Judith King
v.
Bernards Township, Somerset County Prosecutor's Office,
Nicholas Bissell, Timothy Van Hise, Somerset
County Sheriff, Somerset County Warden, John Doe-1

NO. 94-5617

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 22, 1995

Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 94-cv-01971,

Thompson, J.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 F.3d 895, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17901, 1995 WL 406602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-bernards-tp-ca3-1995.