King v. Beeson

8 A. 198, 5 Sadler 59, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 530
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 14, 1887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The main questions in this case involve a conflict of evidence, .and the credibility of witnesses. We see no error in the charge of the court nor in the exclusion of evidence. The case was well submitted.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Beeson, 8 A. 198, 5 Sadler 59, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 530 (Pa. 1887).

8 A. 198 (King v. Beeson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Speight v. Apfel
108 F. Supp. 2d 1087 (C.D. California, 2000)