King v. Barnes

New York Supreme Court

King v. Barnes

22 N.Y. St. Rep. 51

DecidedFebruary 11, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 51 (King v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Barnes, 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 51 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.

—A motion was made at the general term in-December,, in Brooklyn, to appeal order of October 13, 1888, for the appointment of a receiver.

The terminal company has passed into the hands and under the control of new officers, who do not desire further litigation on that subject.

We have affirmed the order of October 13, 1888, at the present term of the court, and it is unnecessary for us now to dismiss the appeal.

We will, therefore, deny this motion to dismiss, without, costs.

Pratt, J., concurs; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

—A motion was made at the general term in-December,, in Brooklyn, to appeal order of October 13, 1888, for the appointment of a receiver.

The terminal company has passed into the hands and under the control of new officers, who do not desire further litigation on that subject.

We have affirmed the order of October 13, 1888, at the present term of the court, and it is unnecessary for us now to dismiss the appeal.

We will, therefore, deny this motion to dismiss, without, costs.

Pratt, J., concurs; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 N.Y. St. Rep. 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-barnes-nysupct-1889.