King v. Bank of Weston

Supreme Court of Georgia

King v. Bank of Weston

143 S.E. 423, 166 Ga. 463, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 328

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 18, 1928·No. No. 6485·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The court, in equity cases, may refer “any part” of the facts to an auditor for investigation and report. Civil Code (1910), § 5127. It was not error to recommit certain issues, or to refuse to recommit others.

2. The report of the auditor was supported by evidence. The court did [464]*464not en- in overruling the exceptions of law and fact, or in rendering a final decree sustaining' tlie report.

No. 6485. May 18, 1928.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices coneur. M. A. Walker, W. P. Wallis, and Hollis Pori, for plaintiff. M. C. Edwards, G. Y. Harrell, and Cleveland Bees, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. The court, in equity cases, may refer “any part” of the facts to an auditor for investigation and report. Civil Code (1910), § 5127. It was not error to recommit certain issues, or to refuse to recommit others.

2. The report of the auditor was supported by evidence. The court did [464]*464not en- in overruling the exceptions of law and fact, or in rendering a final decree sustaining' tlie report.

No. 6485. May 18, 1928.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices coneur. M. A. Walker, W. P. Wallis, and Hollis Pori, for plaintiff. M. C. Edwards, G. Y. Harrell, and Cleveland Bees, for defendant.

King v. Bank of Weston, 143 S.E. 423, 166 Ga. 463, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 328 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

143 S.E. 423 (King v. Bank of Weston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.