Home/Ohio Supreme Court/King v. Am. Std. Ins.

King v. Am. Std. Ins.

860 N.E.2d 763, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1437
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 24, 2007
Docket2006-2162
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 860 N.E.2d 763 (King v. Am. Std. Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Am. Std. Ins., 860 N.E.2d 763, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1437 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-06-1306, 2006-Ohio-5774. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists. This cause is therefore dismissed.

Pfeifer, O’Connor, Lanzinger and Bryant, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent. Peggy Bryant, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Cupp, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntsman v. Aultman Hosp., 2006 Ca 00316 (5-27-2008)
2008 Ohio 2553 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
Huntsman v. Aultman Hosp., 2006 Ca 00331 (5-27-2008)
2008 Ohio 2554 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 N.E.2d 763, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-am-std-ins-ohio-2007.