King v. Altman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

King v. Altman

257 A.D. 828, 12 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8055

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 828 (King v. Altman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Altman, 257 A.D. 828, 12 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying in part defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination modified by striking out the first ordering paragraph and substituting in place thereof the following: “ Ordered that the said motion be and the same hereby is granted as to that part of item numbered “ 1 ” in the said notice of examination which follows the words “ Schedule B ” and as to items numbered “ 4 ” and “ 5 ” in the said notice of examination; and the said motion is in all other respects denied,” and by striking out the second ordering paragraph; and, as thus modified, the order, in so far as an appeal is taken, is affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying in part defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination modified by striking out the first ordering paragraph and substituting in place thereof the following: “ Ordered that the said motion be and the same hereby is granted as to that part of item numbered “ 1 ” in the said notice of examination which follows the words “ Schedule B ” and as to items numbered “ 4 ” and “ 5 ” in the said notice of examination; and the said motion is in all other respects denied,” and by striking out the second ordering paragraph; and, as thus modified, the order, in so far as an appeal is taken, is affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 828, 12 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-altman-nyappdiv-1939.