King v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

King v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth.

798 S.E.2d 521, 2017 N.C. LEXIS 284, 2017 WL 1837939

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 3, 2017

DocketNo. 382PA16

StatusPublished

This text of 798 S.E.2d 521 (King v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth., 798 S.E.2d 521, 2017 N.C. LEXIS 284, 2017 WL 1837939 (N.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendants (Northeastern Ob/Gyn, Ltd., Barbara Ann Carter, M.D., and Angela McWalter, CNM) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Defendants shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendants (Northeastern Ob/Gyn, Ltd., Barbara Ann Carter, M.D., and Angela McWalter, CNM) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Defendants shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

798 S.E.2d 521, 2017 N.C. LEXIS 284, 2017 WL 1837939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-albemarle-hosp-auth-nc-2017.