King v. AIG Life Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

King v. AIG Life Insurance Co.

525 So. 2d 453, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1062, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1929, 1988 WL 43414

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 1988

DocketNo. 88-619

StatusPublished

This text of 525 So. 2d 453 (King v. AIG Life Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. AIG Life Insurance Co., 525 So. 2d 453, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1062, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1929, 1988 WL 43414 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order granting AIG Life Insurance Company’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint for interpleader after entry of the final judgment. Respondent has offered no authority and this court has not found independently any authority for allowing amendment of a complaint after entry of the final judgment. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order allowing amendment of the original complaint after entry of final judgment below is vacated with directions that the final judgment be reinstated. Our ruling in this case does not pass upon the right of the estate of Robert A. Hawkins to commence an independent action to establish [454]*454its interest in the proceeds of the life insurance policy.

WIGGINTON, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order granting AIG Life Insurance Company’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint for interpleader after entry of the final judgment. Respondent has offered no authority and this court has not found independently any authority for allowing amendment of a complaint after entry of the final judgment. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order allowing amendment of the original complaint after entry of final judgment below is vacated with directions that the final judgment be reinstated. Our ruling in this case does not pass upon the right of the estate of Robert A. Hawkins to commence an independent action to establish [454]*454its interest in the proceeds of the life insurance policy.

WIGGINTON, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

525 So. 2d 453, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1062, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1929, 1988 WL 43414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-aig-life-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1988.