King Spider LLC v. 884886 CH Store

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 12, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-03472·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KING SPIDER LLC, Plaintiff, Civil No. 23-cv-3472 (JMF) v. 884886 CH STORE, et al., Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEREAS, Plaintiff King Spider, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Alibaba.com Hong Kong Ltd., Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce Pte. Ltd., and AliExpress E-Commerce One Pte. Ltd. (together, “Alibaba Defendants”) (Plaintiff and Alibaba Defendants collectively, “the Parties”) having agreed to the following terms of confidentiality, and the Court having found that good cause exists for the issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED that the following restrictions and procedures shall apply to the information and documents exchanged by the Parties in connection with the pre-trial phase of this action:

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in the above-captioned action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Stipulation and Protective Order governs discovery in this Action. The Parties also acknowledge that this Stipulation and Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1. Action: the above-captioned action. 2.2. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information: Disclosure or Discovery Material that a Party or

Non-Party in good faith believes contains non-public, confidential, private, personal, proprietary, customer, client, or other commercially sensitive information that requires protection. Disclosure or Discovery Material designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” may include, but is not limited to, any information that constitutes confidential information under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, U.S. and foreign (including, but not limited to, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the People’s Republic of China) privacy, data protection, and secrecy laws as well as bank and/or money service provider regulations. 2.3. Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

2.4. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this Action. 2.5. “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information: Disclosure or Discovery Material that a Party or Non-Party in good faith believes contains non- public information that is so sensitive that disclosure may substantially compromise and/or jeopardize the Producing Party’s business interests, including but not limited to, non-public, confidential, private, personal, proprietary, customer, client, or other commercially sensitive information that requires greater protection than that afforded to Disclosure or Discovery Material designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6. In-House Counsel: Attorneys (including litigation and support staff) who are employees or officers of a Party, who are involved in the oversight of on-going litigation of such

entity. 2.7. Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this Action. 2.8. Outside Counsel: Attorneys (including litigation and support staff) who are not employees, directors, or officers of a Party or a Party’s parents, affiliates, or subsidiaries but who are counsel of record for a Party. 2.9. Outside Consultant: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to this action (including support staff) who has been retained by a Party or its Outside Counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not: (i) a current or anticipated employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor, or (ii) a consultant involved in

product and/or process design or development for a Party or for a Party’s competitor. 2.10. Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, and employees. 2.11. Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.12. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, organizing or processing data) to a Party, and their employees and subcontractors, including, but not limited to, data recovery vendors, graphic consultants, outside copy services, qualified persons taking testimony involving such material, and necessary stenographic and clerical personnel. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this action and mock jurors retained by such a consultant to assist them in their work. Professional Vendors do not include consultants who fall within the definition of Outside Consultant or any Persons that

fall within the definition of Outside Counsel. 2.13. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 2.14. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 2.15. Related Entities: Alibaba.com Hong Kong Limited, Alibaba.com Singapore E- Commerce Pte. and Alibaba Group U.S. Inc. 2.16. Related Entities’ In-House Counsel: Attorneys (including litigation and support staff) who are employees or officers of the Alibaba Defendants’ Related Entities, to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this Action.

3. SCOPE OF PROTECTION FOR PROTECTED MATERIAL This Stipulation and Protective Order shall govern all Protected Material in whatever form, including documents, data, information, interrogatory responses, deposition testimony, deposition transcripts, responses to requests for admission, and any other Protected Material provided, produced, or made available for inspection in response to any method of discovery conducted in this Action. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Protective Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or counsel to or in Court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate order. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent a Producing Party from reviewing, using, or disclosing its own Protected Material in any manner that it deems appropriate. This Stipulation and Protective Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further or additional protection of any Disclosure or Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any way, including, without limitation,

an order that certain matter not be produced at all. 4. GENERAL LIMITATIONS ON DISCLOSURE AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 4.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King Spider LLC v. 884886 CH Store, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

King Spider LLC v. 884886 CH Store (King Spider LLC v. 884886 CH Store) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)