King Solomon Seals-Allah v. State of Missouri, et al.

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided February 10, 2026·No. 4:25-cv-01908·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

KING SOLOMON SEALS-ALLAH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:25-cv-1908-MTS ) STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Doc. [2]; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Because the Application shows he is unable to pay the filing fee, the Court will grant it. After review of Plaintiff’s Complaint and related filings, the Court concludes this case is plainly frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989). For that reason, the Court will enter herewith an Order of Dismissal. Further, the Court will certify that an appeal from the dismissal of this frivolous action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A); see also A-Abart Elec. Supply, Inc. v. Emerson Elec. Co., 956 F.2d 1399, 1407 (7th Cir. 1992) (“An appeal of the dismissal of a frivolous claim is frivolous.”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, Doc. [2], is GRANTED. The Court will enter herewith an Order of Dismissal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(). Dated this 10th day of February 2026. Th ooh THEW T. SCHELP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King Solomon Seals-Allah v. State of Missouri, et al., (E.D. Mo. 2026).

King Solomon Seals-Allah v. State of Missouri, et al. (King Solomon Seals-Allah v. State of Missouri, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related