King, Perry v. Keyes, Randy

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

PERRY KING,

Petitioner, ORDER v.

22-cv-248-jdp RANDY KEYES,

Respondent.

Perry King, appearing pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his federal conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon. I stayed the petition, stating that although King could not obtain relief as the law currently stood, the United States Supreme Court was considering a case that could change under what circumstances petitioners may file § 2241 petitions under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. King v. Keyes, No. 22-cv-248-jdp, 2023 WL 2877606, at *3 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 13, 2023). The Supreme Court has issued a decision in that case, but it does not help King; instead it further restricted the circumstances under which prisoners could seek habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Jones v. Hendrix, 143 S.Ct. 1857, 1869 (June 22, 2023) (federal prisoners who have previously moved to vacate their sentence under § 2255 cannot use the savings clause to file a § 2241 petition based on a new interpretation of a statute). King’s petition is now clearly foreclosed. Accordingly, I will dismiss this case. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Perry King’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED. 2. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Entered July 27, 2023. BY THE COURT:

/s/ ________________________________________ JAMES D. PETERSON District Judge