King-Hill v. Zapata Haynie Corp.
690 So. 2d 91, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 957, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 41, 1997 WL 20837
This text of 690 So. 2d 91 (King-Hill v. Zapata Haynie Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King-Hill v. Zapata Haynie Corp., 690 So. 2d 91, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 957, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 41, 1997 WL 20837 (La. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the companion ease of Diane Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corporation, et al., 95-956 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1/22/97); 690 So.2d 86, in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the plaintiffs-appellants.
AFFIRMED.
COOKS, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corp.
690 So. 2d 86 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
690 So. 2d 91, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 957, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 41, 1997 WL 20837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-hill-v-zapata-haynie-corp-lactapp-1997.