King-Hill v. Zapata Haynie Corp.
690 So. 2d 91, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 957, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 41, 1997 WL 20837
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the companion ease of Diane Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corporation, et al., 95-956 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1/22/97); 690 So.2d 86, in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the plaintiffs-appellants.
AFFIRMED.
COOKS, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King-Hill v. Zapata Haynie Corp., 690 So. 2d 91, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 957, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 41, 1997 WL 20837 (La. Ct. App. 1997).
690 So. 2d 91 (King-Hill v. Zapata Haynie Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corp.
690 So. 2d 86 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)