King Grant-Davis v. Shane Fortune

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2598

KING GRANT-DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHANE FORTUNE; SCOTT BLIEMEISTER; JEROME BURGESS; GREG LEY, of Wal-Mart, Charleston, South Carolina District; WAL-MART,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-04211-PMD)

Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

King Grant-Davis appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant-

Davis v. Fortune, No. 2:15-cv-04211-PMD (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2015).

We decline to consider the arguments Grant-Davis raises for the

first time on appeal. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250

(4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED