King, Ex Parte Levi Alexas
This text of King, Ex Parte Levi Alexas (King, Ex Parte Levi Alexas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant filed a pretrial habeas corpus application claiming that the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 51.14) required that the prosecution against him be dismissed. The trial court denied relief and the court of appeals affirmed that decision. King v. State, 286 S.W.3d 599 (Tex. App.-Amarillo, 2009). Appellant petitioned this Court for discretionary review.
When the Court of Appeals issued its opinion in this case, it did so without the benefit of this Court's recent opinion in Ex parte Doster, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. Crim. App. No. PD-0504-09, Feb. 3, 2010). In Doster, this Court held that a pretrial habeas corpus application, followed by an interlocutory appeal, is not the appropriate vehicle for raising a claim that the prosecution should be dismissed because the State failed to comply with the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. Therefore, we grant Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review, vacate the Court of Appeals's decision, and order that this appeal be dismissed.
En banc
Delivered: March 3, 2010
Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
King, Ex Parte Levi Alexas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-ex-parte-levi-alexas-texcrimapp-2010.