King-Ellis v. United States Postal Service
This text of King-Ellis v. United States Postal Service (King-Ellis v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
2010-3005
KAREN T. KING-ELLIS, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DA0752090005-I-1.
______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MATTHEW J. DOWD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. On the brief was MORRIS E. FISCHER, Law Office of Morris E. Fischer, of Bethesda, Maryland,
MICHAEL P. GOODMAN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and TODD M. HUGHES, Deputy Director. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge , NEWMAN, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 9, 2010 _/s/ Jan Horbaly________________ Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
King-Ellis v. United States Postal Service, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-ellis-v-united-states-postal-service-cafc-2010.