King Development Co. v. Franklin County Board of Revision

678 N.E.2d 936, 78 Ohio St. 3d 483
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 21, 1997
DocketNos. 96-541, 96-542 and 96-545
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 678 N.E.2d 936 (King Development Co. v. Franklin County Board of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King Development Co. v. Franklin County Board of Revision, 678 N.E.2d 936, 78 Ohio St. 3d 483 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Sua sponte, the causes are consolidated. The orders of the Board of Tax Appeals are affirmed on the authority of Sharon Village Ltd. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 479, 678 N.E.2d 932, decided today.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C.O.A. Hous., Inc. v. Van Wert Cty. Bd. of Revision
680 N.E.2d 1023 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Chatterton Club, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision
680 N.E.2d 1023 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
King Dev. Co. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision
1997 Ohio 198 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 N.E.2d 936, 78 Ohio St. 3d 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-development-co-v-franklin-county-board-of-revision-ohio-1997.