King County v. Hewitt-Lea Lumber Co.

257 U.S. 622, 42 S. Ct. 186, 66 L. Ed. 402, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2448
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 30, 1922
DocketNo. 344
StatusPublished

This text of 257 U.S. 622 (King County v. Hewitt-Lea Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King County v. Hewitt-Lea Lumber Co., 257 U.S. 622, 42 S. Ct. 186, 66 L. Ed. 402, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2448 (1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Gray’s Harbor Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19. Writ of certiorari denied upon the same ground.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schlosser v. Hemphill
198 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission
226 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works
237 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Bruce v. Tobin
245 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 U.S. 622, 42 S. Ct. 186, 66 L. Ed. 402, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-county-v-hewitt-lea-lumber-co-scotus-1922.