King Cole Condominium Ass'n v. USPlate Glass Insurance Co.
45 So. 3d 833, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12195, 2010 WL 3239179
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 2010·No. No. 3D09-2390·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
The summary judgment for the defendant insurer entered below is reversed because of the existence of genuine issues of material fact concerning coverage and alleged defenses, including but not limited to compliance with the notice and proof of loss provisions of the policy. See Bankers Ins. Co. v. Macias, 475 So.2d 1216 (Fla.1985); Solano v. Fed. Title & Ins. Co., 229 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); Bray & Gillespie IX, LLC v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 2009 WL 1513400 (M.D.Fla.2009).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King Cole Condominium Ass'n v. USPlate Glass Insurance Co., 45 So. 3d 833, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12195, 2010 WL 3239179 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
45 So. 3d 833 (King Cole Condominium Ass'n v. USPlate Glass Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LoBello v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.
152 So. 3d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)