King & Co. v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.

54 S.E. 756, 125 Ga. 827, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 294
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 5, 1906·Published

Opinion

Cobb, P. J.

1. This case is in principle controlled by the decision in Odom v. Macon Ry. Co., 118 Ga. 792.

2. As the facts were undisputed, and'the determination of the case rested, solely upon a question of law, there was no error in making a final disposition of the ease on certiorari in the superior court. So. Ry. Co. v. DeSaussure, 116 Ga. 54 (2) ; Grimsley v. Alexander, 106 Ga. 165 (2).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent. Certiorari, Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. October 23, 1905. Lowndes Calhoun, for plaintiffs. Rosser & Brandon, W. T. Colquitt, and B, J, Conyers, for defendant,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King & Co. v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co., 54 S.E. 756, 125 Ga. 827, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 294 (Ga. 1906).

54 S.E. 756 (King & Co. v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grimsley v. Alexander
32 S.E. 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Odum & Cochran v. Macon & Birmingham Railway Co.
45 S.E. 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)