King Arthur Toyota, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
This text of 522 F.2d 621 (King Arthur Toyota, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
522 F.2d 621
90 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2747, 77 Lab.Cas. P 11,094
KING ARTHUR TOYOTA, INC., Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 74-2241.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 25, 1975.
James A. Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Jay E. Shanklin, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for respondent.
ORDER
Before MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SMITH,* District Judge.
The order of the Board issued June 28, 1974, and reported at 212 N.L.R.B. No. 42, is enforced in full.
Honorable Russell E. Smith, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
522 F.2d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-arthur-toyota-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca9-1975.