King Appeal
205 A.2d 629, 204 Pa. Super. 490, 1964 Pa. Super. LEXIS 619
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 16, 1964·No. Appeal, No. 419·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Opinion
This appeal from an order dismissing a rule to show cause why there should not be reargument on exception to, and an appeal from, the award of a Board of View is affirmed upon the opinion of Clin[492] ton Btjdd Palmer, P. J., written for the court en banc of the'Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, reported at 34 Pa. D. & .C. 2d 371.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King Appeal, 205 A.2d 629, 204 Pa. Super. 490, 1964 Pa. Super. LEXIS 619 (Pa. Ct. App. 1964).
205 A.2d 629 (King Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re: Condemn by City of Phila. Airport Bus. Ctr.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2026
Stradling v. East Berlin Borough
74 Pa. D. & C.2d 473 (Adams County Court of Common Pleas, 1976)
General State Authority v. Hineline
62 Pa. D. & C.2d 322 (Monroe County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Rizzo Condemnation
51 Pa. D. & C.2d 410 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Snyder Condemnation
51 Pa. D. & C.2d 445 (Columbia County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
State Roads Commission v. O'Boyle
243 A.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1968)