Kinesis Advertising, Inc. v. Hill
Opinion
KINESIS ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff
v.
Larry HILL, Dan Robinette, and Altyris Incorporated, Defendants
v.
Robert K. Adkins, Nancy J. Adkins, and Adkins & Associates, Ltd. and Steve Reavis, Additional Counterclaim Defendants.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
James R. Saintsing, J. Michael Thomas, Greensboro, for Hill and Robinette.
Pamela S. Duffy, Burlington, for Kinesis Advertising, et al.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ____, 652 S.E.2d 284.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendants (Hill & Robinette) on the 11th day of December 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff and Additional Counterclaim Defendants, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of December 2007 by Defendants *486 (Hill & Robinette) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
658 S.E.2d 485 (Kinesis Advertising, Inc. v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.