Kineon v. . Hoffman

134 N.E. 598, 232 N.Y. 624, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1212
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 N.E. 598 (Kineon v. . Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kineon v. . Hoffman, 134 N.E. 598, 232 N.Y. 624, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1212 (N.Y. 1922).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ranno v. Ranno
2 Misc. 2d 940 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 N.E. 598, 232 N.Y. 624, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kineon-v-hoffman-ny-1922.