Kineon v. . Hoffman

134 N.E. 598, 232 N.Y. 624, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1212
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kineon v. . Hoffman, 134 N.E. 598, 232 N.Y. 624, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1212 (N.Y. 1922).

134 N.E. 598 (Kineon v. . Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ranno v. Ranno
2 Misc. 2d 940 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)