Kindrick v. State

336 So. 2d 480
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 13, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1824
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 336 So. 2d 480 (Kindrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kindrick v. State, 336 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the briefs and record in this case and find no merit to appellant’s contentions except that as the appellee concedes, the sentence to “hard labor” is sur-plusage and should be stricken. McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). In all other respects the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

MAGER, C. J., and DOWNEY and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Austin v. State
336 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 So. 2d 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kindrick-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.