Kindrick v. State
336 So. 2d 480
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 1976·No. No. 75-1824·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We have considered the briefs and record in this case and find no merit to appellant’s contentions except that as the appellee concedes, the sentence to “hard labor” is sur-plusage and should be stricken. McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). In all other respects the judgment and sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kindrick v. State, 336 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).
336 So. 2d 480 (Kindrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Austin v. State
336 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)