Kindred v. State
This text of 33 Tex. 67 (Kindred v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an indictment for disturbing religious worship.
In this cause the only error assigned by appellant as cause for the reversal of the judgment is the overruling of the motion to quash the indictment as set forth in the bill of exceptions.
This court can see no valid objection to the decision of the court below, in this respect. The charge (in the indictment) of the offense is in the exact words of the statute. (See Paschal’s Dig., Art. 1104.) The judgment is therefore affirmed and remanded.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Tex. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kindred-v-state-tex-1870.